Volume 54 | Number 4 | August 2019

Abstract List

Catherine Chanfreau‐Coffinier PhD, Donna L. Washington MD, MPH, Emmeline Chuang Ph.D., Julian Brunner PhD, Jill E. Darling MSHS, Ismelda Canelo MPA, Elizabeth M. Yano


To examine the relationship between care fragmentation and patient ratings of care quality and identify potentially actionable mediators.

Data Sources/Study Setting

2015 telephone survey of 1395 women Veterans with three or more visits in primary care and/or women's health care in the prior year at 12 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers.

Study Design

Cross‐sectional analysis.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

We operationalized lower care fragmentation as receiving VA‐only care versus dual use of VA/non‐VA care. Participants rated VA care quality (overall care, women's health care (WH), and primary care (PC)) and three aspects of their patient experience (ease of access to services, provider communication, and gender sensitivity of VA environments). We examined associations between care fragmentation and care ratings and applied the Karlson‐Holm‐Breen decomposition method to test for mediation by aspects of patients’ experience.

Principal Findings

Lower care fragmentation was associated with higher ratings of care quality (odds ratios [95% CI] for overall care: 1.57 [1.14;2.17]; WH: 1.65 [1.20;2.27]; PC: 1.41 [1.10;1.82]). Relationships were mediated by patient‐rated provider communication and gender sensitivity (26‐54 percent and 14‐15 percent of total effects, respectively). Ease of access was associated with higher care ratings (odds ratios [95% CI] for overall care: 2.93 [2.25;3.81]; WH: 2.81 [2.15;3.68]; PC: 2.33 [1.63;3.33], in models with the three types of patient care experiences included), but did not mediate the association of care fragmentation and care ratings.


Potential negative effects of care fragmentation on care quality ratings could be mitigated by attention to quality of patient‐provider communication and gender sensitivity of VA environments.