Volume 53 | Number S1 | August 2018

Abstract List

Lee Squitieri M.D., Ph.D., M.S., Daniel A. Waxman M.D., Ph.D., Carol M. Mangione, Debra Saliba M.D., M.P.H., Clifford Y. Ko M.D., M.S., M.S.H.S., Jack Needleman, David A. Ganz M.D., Ph.D.


To evaluate national present‐on‐admission (POA) reporting for hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) and examine the impact of quality measure exclusion criteria on HAPU rates.

Data Sources/Study Setting

Medicare inpatient, outpatient, and nursing facility data as well as independent provider claims (2010–2011).

Study Design

Retrospective cross‐sectional study.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

We evaluated acute inpatient hospital admissions among Medicare fee‐for‐service (FFS) beneficiaries in 2011. Admissions were categorized as follows: (1) no pressure ulcer diagnosis, (2) new pressure ulcer diagnosis, and (3) previously documented pressure ulcer diagnosis. HAPU rates were calculated by varying patient exclusion criteria.

Principal Findings

Among admissions with a pressure ulcer diagnosis, we observed a large discrepancy in the proportion of admissions with a HAPU based on hospital‐reported POA data (5.2 percent) and the proportion with a new pressure ulcer diagnosis based on patient history in billing claims (49.7 percent). Applying quality measure exclusion criteria resulted in removal of 91.2 percent of admissions with a pressure injury diagnosis from HAPU rate calculations.


As payers and health care organizations expand the use of quality measures, it is important to consider how the measures are implemented, coding revisions to improve measure validity, and the impact of patient exclusion criteria on provider performance evaluation.