Volume 53 | Number 6 | December 2018

Abstract List

Elizabeth Tarlov Ph.D., R.N., Coady Wing Ph.D., Howard S. Gordon M.D., Stephen A. Matthews, Kelly K. Jones B.S.N., Lisa M. Powell Ph.D., Shannon N. Zenk Ph.D.


To estimate the causal effects of a population‐scale behavioral weight management program and to determine whether the program's effectiveness depends on participants’ geographic access to places to purchase healthy and less healthy foods.

Data Sources

Secondary data from U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs clinical and administrative records (2008–2014), retail food environment measures from commercial databases (2008–2014), and the American Community Survey (2009–2014).

Study Design

We estimated the effect of the 's ! weight management program on body mass index after 6 months using difference‐in‐difference regressions to compare participants with a propensity score‐matched control group. We estimated treatment effects overall and in subgroups with different access to supermarkets, fast‐food restaurants, and convenience stores.

Principal Findings

! reduced by about 0.71 units among men and 0.70 units among women. The program was slightly less effective for men living near fast‐food restaurants or convenience stores. We found no evidence that treatment effects varied with the food environment among women.


The residential food environment modestly alters ! effectiveness among men. A greater understanding of environmental barriers to and facilitators of intentional weight loss is needed. This study highlights important potential intersections between health care and the community.