Volume 48 | Number 6pt2 | December 2013

Abstract List

Debra L. Scammon, Andrada Tomoaia‐Cotisel, Rachel L. Day, Julie Day, Jaewhan Kim, Norman J. Waitzman, Timothy W. Farrell, Michael K. Magill


To demonstrate the value of mixed methods in the study of practice transformation and illustrate procedures for connecting methods and for merging findings to enhance the meaning derived.

Data Source/Study Setting

An integrated network of university‐owned, primary care practices at the niversity of tah (Community Clinics or s). has adopted Care by Design, its version of the Patient Centered Medical Home.

Study Design

Convergent case study mixed methods design.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Analysis of archival documents, internal operational reports, in‐clinic observations, chart audits, surveys, semistructured interviews, focus groups, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database, and the tah All Payer Claims Database.

Principal Findings

Each data source enriched our understanding of the change process and understanding of reasons that certain changes were more difficult than others both in general and for particular clinics. Mixed methods enabled generation and testing of hypotheses about change and led to a comprehensive understanding of practice change.


Mixed methods are useful in studying practice transformation. Challenges exist but can be overcome with careful planning and persistence.