Volume 53 | Number 3 | June 2018

Abstract List

Jan Bauer Dr. Med., Ruth Müller Dr. Rer. Nat., Dörthe Brüggmann PD., Dr. Med., David A. Groneberg Prof. Dr. Med., Dr. Hc. Mult.


Objective

To analyze the general practitioners (s) with regard to the degree of urbanization, social deprivation, general health, and disability.


Data Sources

Small area population data and practice data in England.


Study Design

We used a floating catchment area method to measure spatial accessibility with regard to the degree of urbanization, social deprivation, general health, and disability.


Data Collection

Data were collected from the Office for National Statistics and the general practice census and analyzed using a geographic information system.


Principal Findings

In all, 25.8 percent of the population in England lived in areas with a significant low accessibility (mean ‐score: −4.2); 27.6 percent lived in areas with a significant high accessibility (mean ‐score: 7.7); 97.8 percent of high accessibility areas represented urban areas, and 31.1 percent of low accessibility areas represented rural areas (correlation of accessibility and urbanity:  = 0.59; <.001). Furthermore, a minor negative correlation with social deprivation was present ( = −0.19; <.001). Results were confirmed by a multivariate analysis.


Conclusion

This study showed substantially differing accessibility throughout England. However, socially deprived areas did not have poorer spatial access to s.