Volume 52 | Number 1 | February 2017

Abstract List

Virginia Wang Ph.D., Matthew L. Maciejewski Ph.D., Cynthia J. Coffman Ph.D., Linda L. Sanders M.P.H, Shoou‐Yih Daniel Lee Ph.D., Richard Hirth Ph.D, Joseph Messana M.D.


To examine the relationship between distance to dialysis provider and patient selection of dialysis modality, informed by the absolute distance from a patient's home and relative distance of alternative modalities.

Data Sources

U.S. Renal Data System.

Study Design

About 70,131 patients initiating chronic dialysis and 4,795 dialysis facilities in 2006. The primary outcome was patient utilization of peritoneal dialysis (). Independent variables included absolute distance between patients' home and the nearest hemodialysis () facility, relative distance between patients' home and nearest versus nearest facilities, and their interaction. Logistic regression was used to model distance on use, controlling for patient and market characteristics.

Principal Findings

Nine percent of incident dialysis patients used in 2006. There was a positive, nonlinear relationship between absolute distance to services and use ( < .0001), with the magnitude of the effect increasing at greater distances. In terms of relative distance, odds of use increased if a facility was closer or the same distance as the nearest facility ( = .006). Interaction of distance measures to dialysis facilities was not significant.


Analyses of patient choice between alternative treatments should model distance to reflect all relevant dimensions of geographic access to treatment options.