VOLUME 54 | NUMBER 5 | OCTOBER 2019
Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws
Objective: To build a longitudinal statelevel database on targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws.
Data Sources: Primary sources included state websites, Lexis Nexis Quicklaw, and WestlawNext. We used a range of secondary sources to pinpoint policy timing.
Study Design: This was a statelevel review of TRAP shifts from 1973 to present.
Data Collection: We captured data on TRAP policy activity and timing, focusing specifically on ambulatory surgical center (ASC) laws, admitting privilege requirements, and transfer agreements.
Principal Findings: Twentyfive states had ever enacted an ASC, admitting privilege, or transfer agreement law. Many currently face legal challenges.
Conclusions: Targeted regulation of abortion providers laws are favored by many states as a way to regulate abortion provision. These data can be used to better understand the impact of these laws.
Copyright© 2018, Health Research & Educational Trust. All rights reserved. Content Disclaimer
Health Research & Educational Trust, 155 North Wacker, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 422.2600