VOLUME 54 | NUMBER 4 | AUGUST 2019
Physician network position and patient outcomes following implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Objective: To evaluate two novel measures of physician network centrality and their associations with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) procedure volume and health outcomes.
Data Sources: Medicare claims and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry data from 2007 to 2011.
Study Design: We constructed a national cardiovascular disease patientsharing physician network and used network analysis to characterize physician network centrality with two measures: withinhospital degree centrality (number of connections within a hospital) and acrosshospital degree centrality (number of connections across hospitals). The primary outcome was riskadjusted 2year case fatality. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the effects of physician's withinhospital and acrosshospital degree centrality on case fatality. We included 105 109 ICD therapy patients and 3474 ICD implanting physicians in our analyses.
Principal Findings: After controlling for other physician and hospital characteristics, we observed greater riskadjusted case fatality among patients treated by physicians in the highest acrosshospital degree tertile compared to lowest tertile (OR [95% CI] = 1.10 [1.041.16], P =0.001) and lowest tertile volume physicians compared with highest volume (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.840.95], P <0.001). Physician's withinhospital degree tertile was inversely associated with case fatality but not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Degree centrality measures capture information independent of procedure volume and raise questions about the quality of physicians with networks that predict worse health outcomes.
Copyright© 2018, Health Research & Educational Trust. All rights reserved. Content Disclaimer
Health Research & Educational Trust, 155 North Wacker, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 422.2600