Powered by: Blackwell Publishing

HRET - Health Research & Educational Trust

HSR - Health Services Research

Impacting Health Practice and Policy Through State-of-the-Art Research and Thinking

Our Next Issue

June 2018
Coming Soon! Read

< ABSTRACT LIST

VOLUME 50 | NUMBER 2 | APRIL 2015


Impact of a Pharmacy Benefit Change on New Use of Mail Order Pharmacy among Diabetes Patients: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)

Keywords: Mail order pharmacy;pharmacy benefit designs;comparative effectiveness;health disparities;difference-in-differences;marginal structural model;inverse probability treatment weighting

Objective: To assess the impact of a pharmacy benefit change on mail order pharmacy (MOP) uptake.

Data Sources/Study Setting: Race-stratified, random sample of diabetes patients in an integrated health care delivery system.

Study Design: In this natural experiment, we studied the impact of a pharmacy benefit change that conditionally discounted medications if patients used MOP and prepaid two copayments. We compared MOP uptake among those exposed to the benefit change (n = 2,442) and the reference group with no benefit change (n = 8,148), and estimated differential MOP uptake across social strata using a difference-in-differences framework.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Ascertained MOP uptake (initiation among previous nonusers).

Principal Findings: Thirty percent of patients started using MOP after receiving the benefit change versus 9 percent uptake among the reference group (p < .0001). After adjustment, there was a 26 percentage point greater MOP uptake (benefit change effect). This benefit change effect was significantly smaller among patients with inadequate health literacy (15 percent less), limited English proficiency (14 percent less), and among Latinos and Asians (24 and 16 percent less compared to Caucasians).

Conclusions: Conditionally discounting medications delivered by MOP effectively stimulated MOP uptake overall, but it unintentionally widened previously existing social gaps in MOP use because it stimulated less MOP uptake in vulnerable populations.

back to top | back to article index | purchase full article

Copyright© 2017, Health Research & Educational Trust. All rights reserved. Content Disclaimer
Health Research & Educational Trust, 155 North Wacker, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 422.2600